Radloff Family

April 2002

November 2003

January 2004

September 2004

October 2004

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

July 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

June 2011

July 2011

November 2013

Andersen Family

Bouncing Around

Deeper End of Chaos


I Am Not a Mused

Gifts from a Broad

Lots Better Then Your Blog

Grant Miller Media

Human Voices

Passionate Dale

Skyler's Dad

Vegetable Assassin

Able Home Builders

Advanced Computers

Affordable Cars

Alchemy Trans. Svcs.

Bill's Urban Wear

Byron Kuehl

The Chesterfield

Enabled Vets Outdoors

Fleet US

Healing Run

Heartland Hearth

Hope Talks


Iowa Dual Recovery Anonymous

Knotty Pine Kreations

Leather 'n Hawgs

Magnificent Board of Directors

Midwest Pipe

Northwest Iowa ALR

Parrot Film Co.

RVP Sports Productions

Shesler Hall

Simply Staged for You

Siouxland Freedom Fest

Siouxland Honor Flight

Siouxland Sleep Out

Tall Paul's Pickled Asparagus

Tom Foolery's

Monday, February 25, 2008


A "veteran," whether active duty, discharged, retired, or reserve, is someone who, at one point in life, wrote a blank check to the United States of America, for the amount "up to and including my life."
A friend sent me the above quote. It was in my in-box when I got back from a funeral escort for a young man killed in Iraq. Sometimes the check comes due. Everyone who has worn a military uniform is aware of that. I sometimes wonder if our government is.

Friday, February 22, 2008


Busy busy busy...

Sorry I haven't blogged lately. I've just been busy. Terribly, incredibly busy.

I'm so tired...

I'll be back soon, I promise.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Up in Smoke

Iowa Debates Anti-Smoking Law

Today the Iowa House of Representatives is set to debate the latest anti-smoking law to come across the table. The new law would ban smoking in restaurants and bars, with the exception of casinos (because, apparently, they donate a lot of money to politicians, and they're a grand source of tax revenue) and small privately-owned bars (such as veterans clubs).

I have mixed emotions on this... I smoked for 25 years. I started my one and a half pack a day addiction in my teens and couldn't shake it until just two and a half years ago. (In fact, that's why I started this blog in the first place -- to give me something to do in the middle of the night when the cravings hit. Here's one of my earlier posts if you're interested. The photos disappeared for some reason, but I'm not too worried about that.) So smoking and I have a long history...

When I was in high school I had to go to Smokers Anonymous so I could stay on the wrestling and cross-country teams. I was the only one in SA... I eventually quit sports.

I joined the Army National Guard the day I turned 17. I remember taking a carton of cigarettes with me to Basic Training. They took them away from me... For the first week we were there we couldn't smoke, so we all chewed tobacco. As soon as we earned smoking privileges we all started right back up. In an odd sociological twist, out of the 52 men in my platoon only about 15 or so smoked when we started basic training -- but 49 smoked by the time we finished ten weeks later. The Army had a bad habit of giving us the occasional smoke break, only to walk past us as we stood there happily puffing away and point at two or three guys at random to go do some chore or errand. Invariably the Drill Instructors would choose people who weren't smoking, possibly because they looked like they weren't doing anything. So many people started smoking simply to avoid the extra duties the DIs were handing out to non-smokers. I don't think this was a conscious thing on the sergeants' part, but it was very much apparent. (All my Drill Sergeants smoked, by the way, as did all the officers.)

A few years later, back in Iowa, I was sorely upset when the state banned smoking in government buildings -- including the armory. I was very used to having an ashtray on my desk whilst at drills.

When I was a freshman in college, I remember being bitterly disappointed when they banned smoking in the classrooms (yes, at one point a college kid could smoke in a lecture, believe it or not) just the year before. My sophomore or junior year they banned smoking in any campus building except the Student Union and individual dorms, and I used my position on the school newspaper to holler indignantly that "smokers are people too" and should be given at least a "smoking closet" or some area indoors where they could smoke without bothering others. It seemed cruel to me for the administration to make us go stand outside in the snow... And I was used to doing my homework in the library with a cigarette smoldering next to me. I took the "No Smoking" signs personally, and bristled.

Once I graduated and landed the job of my dreams here at the print shop I was happy to see that everyone had an ashtray within arm's reach. My kinda place! But my joy was short-lived... Within six months the company had merged and moved to a different building, where I had to walk all the way to the back room (six feet from my desk) to smoke. My co-workers often complained about the smell of my cigarettes wafting through the open door into the office, but I found the necessary temerity to ignore their whining. A few years later the bosses told us we could only smoke in the break room or outside. Shortly after that they told us to go outside. I was NOT happy.

But here's the funny part... Every time someone limited the areas where I could smoke, I complained bitterly about my rights being trampled upon, but within days I was used to the new routine and it no longer bothered me. In fact, I found that I actually enjoyed having to go outside to smoke -- it forced me to get away from my desk for a few minutes, and I noticed that I didn't smoke as much as I had previously. In 2001 or 2002, both Dagmar and I quit smoking in our own house. We voluntarily went outside to smoke... Our house stunk, to be honest, and the walls were changing color, turning from "Misty Alpine Fog" to "Dingy Tan." I still smoked in the car, but not in the house.

In July 2005 I smoked my last cigarette. I still have urges occasionally, but the horrible physical cravings are gone. When I see photos of myself from years past it surprises me that in nearly every photo I have a cigarette... I didn't know it was such a pervasive part of my life. I'm glad I'm done with it.

So how do I feel about the proposed ban? Well, as I said earlier, I have mixed feelings... The first thing I thought when I heard about the ban was "FINALLY I can go to a club and watch a band without having to deal with cigarettes and feeling all congested and stinky the next day! Thank God! Maybe now Dagmar and I can go to a restaurant. Boy, it's gonna be GOOD to be able to get back out into society again!" That's how ninety-five percent of me feels -- relieved and happy at the prospect of smoke-free establishments. The other five percent feels a little guilty, like I'm turning my back on my former life, flip-flopping my morals of 20+ years ago. I took a stand for years that smokers have a right to a smoking room in every public building. Now that I no longer smoke, do I change that stand? Is that wrong? I dunno...

It would probably surprise some of our friends, but Dagmar and I sometimes stay home simply to avoid the smoke. When we make plans, the subject invariably comes up... "What do you want to do? Shall we go downtown for a beer and see a band, or shall we go out to eat?" I'll ask. "Well," she'll respond, "if we go see a band it'll be all smoky and stinky..." We don't mind if our friends smoke outside or in another room, but it does bother us to be around cigarette smoke. It makes my lungs hurt, both Dagmar and I will have headaches and sore throats the following day, and, quite frankly, it gives me cravings. So I'd rather avoid it if possible.

I'm struggling with people's rights and freedoms. Does your freedom to smoke trump my freedom to want clean air? After all, I'm free to stay home if I want, but smokers are also free to go outside to enjoy a cigarette.

Is a ban a good thing? Sure it is. I support it -- it would make life better and easier for Dagmar and myself, and would make the state a little healthier. But a little piece of me thinks it would be okay to have a separate room for smokers... A well-ventilated room on the other side of the bar, preferably... I'm really, REALLY looking forward to being able to go out and have a beer in a smoke-free environment, and I'm a little sad that my favorite place (the Legion club in Le Mars) will be exempt from the rule. I would never tell the combat veteran sitting at the bar in a veterans' club that he couldn't sit and have a beer and a cigarette in peace, but I am a little sad that I'll still have to endure cigarette smoke. (Like I said, I still get cravings when I smell a cigarette. It makes me twitchy, rude, and generally anxious and vaguely unhappy.)

I'll leave you with two statements. The first is that I'm NOT trying to start a debate here -- I don't mean to upset anyone, I'm just sorting through my feelings on the issue. The second is that when I did smoke, I quickly readjusted to whatever laws or rules were in place, and it soon became second-nature for me to follow the rules and be content.

Sunday, February 10, 2008


Bill O'Reilly Needs to Apologize

Thanks to Pixie for pointing this one out...

We have homeless Iraq War veterans right here in Sioux City, Iowa (population 80,000). I shudder to think at how many Iraq, Gulf, Vietnam and Korean War veterans are homeless nationwide.

Homelessness is an especially pervasive problem with veterans, especially those who suffer from untreated Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and find it difficult to find and hold jobs. Many end up with addiction problems due to the PTSD, which compounds the issue. If we, as a nation and a society, send men and women to do difficult and harrowing things in our name, we NEED to take care of them when they come back home. Prompt treatment for depression and PTSD is the first step, and would (in my opinion) lessen the homeless problem for veterans.

All Sorts of Stuff


A few days ago a friend of mine sent me a photo of a rainbow she'd seen. Rainbows are nice. (I always think of Genesis 9 and my mother when I see a rainbow.)

We don't see many rainbows in Iowa this time of year. Right now (I just checked) the temperature is zero. The high today is forecast to be four degrees. (That's Fahrenheit, not Celsius.) Yesterday the wind was a-howlin' at the doors something fierce. The pictures don't do it justice, but I took the photos so someone's gotta look at them. Lucky you.

I had to drive to Le Mars from Sioux City to do some work for the Legion Riders yesterday, and I don't seem to be able to drive a car more than five blocks without hanging my camera out the window for some reason. The last picture there is of Le Mars, IA, population 8,000. As you can see, there aren't any rainbows in the photos.

Winter came early this year, and we've had no reprieve. There was an ice storm in November, followed by a snowstorm just a few days later. People are complaining that they still have the original ice and snow on their sidewalks; usually we get a "January thaw" where temps rise into the 40s for a day or two to melt off some of the snow and ice, but what little thaw we had this year was brief and chilly indeed. It's hard to fathom that spring and summer exist. If I didn't have photos of trees with leaves on them I wouldn't believe such things are possible.


I caught myself spewing politics on a friend's blog and realized that if political spewing should happen, it should happen here. (Spew. What a word. Spew.)

My political feelings at this point are: Gobama! Barack to the Future! Yay...

I still feel that New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson was the best candidate on either side of the aisle, and I hope he gets tapped for Secretary of State in the new administration, no matter who's President. But Governor Richardson is no longer in the race, so I have to content myself in pontificating the virtues and foibles of the remaining five candidates, Senator Barack Obama, Senator Hillary Clinton, Congressman Ron Paul, former Governor Mike Huckabee, and Senator John McCain.

Senator Obama (D):
He's the top of my list, though mostly by default. The things I like about Senator Obama are that he's a passionate speaker, he seems to be able to truly unite people (which is something we sorely need today), and he has a good grasp on domestic affairs, the economy, and foreign policy. He's not the best-versed in any of those categories, but neither is he the most ignorant. I like his overall message.

I hope he can survive the mud that's sure to be slung his direction. I've already seen about half a zillion e-mails come through my in-box claiming that the Senator is an Islamic Fundamentalist (false), that his name rhymes with "Osama" (like that proves something about his personality or qualifications), and that he doesn't have the experience Senator Clinton has (like his six years in the Senate were somehow shorter dog-years than Clinton's six years in the senate).

Senator Clinton (D):
Is the nation ready for a female president? Sure! Is Senator Clinton qualified enough to be an effective leader? Sure! Would she be a good president? Probably would. But she's entirely the wrong person this time around.

Half the country rabidly hates Mrs. Clinton -- often without really knowing why. She's a divisive personality at a time when we need someone to bring the country back together. Whether it's deserved or not, Billary has a reputation for pulling shady back-room deals, ruthlessly grabbing power, and generally being a bit thuggish in her ways. Republicans foam at the mouth over this, often overlooking the fact that she actually knows what she's talking about. (And I will readily admit that I'm exactly the same way with President Bush. The man makes me apoplectic, and I really have a hard time giving his policies and ideas a fair shake.)

The nation is already split in half. The last thing we need is yet another "divider."

Congressman Ron Paul (L -- no, I. wait... R)
Of the Republican candidates, I like Congressman Paul's stands the best, though to be honest I don't know as much about him as I should. Unfortunately, he's seen as a bit of a kook. Had he run as a Libertarian (which was his original party of choice) I would possibly have voted for him. Last I heard, he was more or less dropping out of the race to concentrate on his congressional primary in Texas.

Mike Huckabee (R)
I don't like people running on moral agendas. I have my own opinions on stuff, thank you. I don't really want a president making laws on what he thinks is best for me -- I want a president making laws to keep me safe, and to provide me basic services, not preaching morality. I also think his foreign policy views are skewed, and his economic policy is flawed. Other than that, I think he's a nice guy...

Senator McCain (R):
Senator McCain was the perfect candidate in 2000. Now, in 2008, I have my worries and doubts. I don't often agree with his views on the economy. I'm happy that he doesn't push his morality as much as other candidates on the Republican side have been known to do. (Please don't legislate morality -- instead make immorality unnecessary.) Senator McCain is running on his strength in foreign affairs, notably his insistence that we stay in Iraq "fifty years, a hundred years."

This worries me.

Why are we in Iraq? We went there on the basis of faulty information (remember the weapons of mass destruction?) when, in my opinion, we should have been concentrating our forces on those who attacked us on September 11th -- Al Queada and Osama bin Laden. We did invade Iraq, however, so we must needs deal with it. It seems to me that we won the war the minute we captured Iraqi leader and thug-in-chief Saddam Hussein. We've won. The Iraqi people are free. Let's now get out of their way and let them get about the business of building their government -- and let's concentrate our forces on terrorism. Will terrorism flourish in Iraq if we shift our forces from Iraq to Afghanistan? Possibly. If so, we can go in again under the aegis of the war on terrorism, but for now Iraq poses no threat to the United States, while the terrorists DO pose such a threat. I posit the Iraq War is over. We won. Let's move on. (I realize that Big Oil, Haliburton, and civilian contractors such as Blackwater are making a ton of moolah off the war, but we're going to have to pull them off the corporate welfare teat called "Iraq" they've been sucking on the last seven years if we're going to survive as a world power, lest they suck us dry.)

It seems to me that Senator McCain will force the United States to push all our assets into Iraq, ignoring other, more pressing concerns, such as terrorism abroad and poverty at home. What he'll do as far as domestic affairs, economic concerns, etc. is a mystery -- he really spends all his time talking about continuing the war.

In conclusion:
I'm pulling for Obama. I'm still sore that Richardson didn't get noticed much in the primaries, but whaddaya gonna do?

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

Isn't this against the law?

They robbed the GIRL SCOUTS?

Thanks to Dad Anderson for pointing this news story out...

A pair of 17-year-old, apparently affluent teen girls stole $166 from a girl scout who was out selling cookies. When confronted on-camera, one girl said, "we went through all that trouble to get it [the money] and now we have to give it back -- I'm pissed." The other girl said, "I'm not sorry we did it. I'm sorry we got caught."

What kind of society do we live in where rich teens steal from 9-year-old Girl Scouts, and later act as if they were entitled to the money in the first place? The two teens need to be taught one helluva lesson, but I'm sure Daddy will pay their way out of trouble. If I understood the video correctly, the girls did NOT get arrested. That baffles me. They stole $160+ from a Girl Scout and were not punished. Try walking into a bank and grabbing $160 and walking out -- see what kind of trouble you get into.

They need to take responsibility for their actions. It's the only way these teens will learn how to be adults. The Girl Scouts are much more mature than the crooks. If their parents won't teach them responsibility, shouldn't we? Isn't that what juvenile court is for?


You want a hundred and sixty bucks? Go work for three days like the rest of us.

Saturday, February 02, 2008

Nothing of Import

Just a quick update (what I had for breakfast)...

There's nothing of any social significance in this post; I simply feel like I should write something so people don't think I've forgotten my blog.

It's been two weeks since my "procedure," and my right "boy" is still the size of a rather elongated lemon. The fierce, piercing pain is gone (thankfully), but I'm still all bruised, tender, achy and sore -- like you'd expect of a bruised testicle the size of a lemon, I guess. It's hard for me to walk very far, and getting in and out of the car is particularly painful. I can sit long enough to get some work done, but it's not comfortable. The doctor tells me it could be weeks before the swelling goes down noticeably and months before it's gone. I've quit taking painkillers about a week ago, but I still take ibuprofin almost every day. I can't believe I'm lucky enough to have Dagmar -- she's been incredibly patient, kind, helpful, caring... She's the best. She really takes good care of me, and I'm grateful. The cat, on the other hand, who weighs about fifteen pounds, likes to jump in my lap unexpectedly. Dagmar's had several heart-to-hearts with Fruitloop about that. He seems to listen.

I've been busy taking care of that, getting my eight hours' of work in at the print shop every day (gotta work part of the weekend, which makes me unhappy), developing a couple freelance web sites, and learning a whole slew of new software on the fly. (Just once I wish I could learn new software BEFORE I have an important project that needs to be done using said software. It would be nice to at least skim the book before getting tossed to the wolves...) I've had so much going on the past month my head is spinning. I'm reasonably close to getting most of my projects wrapped up, so with luck the next few weeks won't be so hectic and I can concentrate on healing my busted nut and trying to find a way to freelance my way out of the print shop.

Dagmar got her hair done today and looks fantastic! I'll get a photo of her new doo soon.

I hope everything is right in your respective worlds, and that the winter is treating you gently! Only 17 more months 'till spring!

Copyright 2001-2010 | Designed by Chris @ HippieBoy Design | Contact Chris | Contact Dagmar